Wrapping Up Summer Research

My research under the Unstable Archives project aims to build a born-digital archive of a rare family collection containing the personal artifacts of Elizabeth Sharaf un-Nisa, a native Indian woman who married a European man and moved with him to Britain. More broadly, it seeks to study the lives of women like Sharaf un-Nisa who cohabited with European men during the colonial period.

For the first part of my research, I studied academic literature concerning native women in colonial India. The first book I read was Sex and the Family in Colonial India by Durba Ghosh. Here, Ghosh compiles her archival research about the dynamics of relationships between European men and Indian women. She argues that, despite a different definition of race in the 18th century, European concerns about racial and cultural mixing persisted, later forming the basis for scientific racism and other interracial dynamics (Ghosh 2006, 15). Interracial relationships were common in early colonial India, in part due to the lack of European women (Ghosh 2006, 36). However, even the most cosmopolitan European men expressed insecurities about their relationships with Indian women, including fears for the future of mixed-race children born from such affairs (Ghosh 2006, 11). Adjacently, the East India Company and other colonial officials viewed these relationships as corrosive to the moral and societal order; as such, they suppressed mentions of native women in archival records and public life (Ghosh 2006, 93). The anxieties surrounding interracial relationships with Indian women were thus integral in shaping the administrative policies of the East India Company and, later, British colonial rule in India itself.

The second book I read was Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India by Indrani Chatterjee. While Ghosh’s book focuses on the nuances of interracial relationships, Chatterjee explores the definition of slavery in colonial India, particularly for children and female domestic slaves. Chatterjee defines different forms of slave labor, including the labor of sexual reproduction; thus, she argues that slavery in colonial India must be considered with slave-concubines and other women in mind (1999, 239). However, as does Ghosh, Chatterjee acknowledges and investigates colonial officials’ attempts to suppress mentions of domestic slavery or to reframe them in a manner conforming to their ideals of marriage (1999, 226). She examines the laws and legal justifications used by colonial administrators to claim that, through suppression by colonial officials and the biased interpretations of prior historians, the existence of domestic slavery was concealed, though it remained alive in practice (Chatterjee 1999, 232). Like Ghosh, Chatterjee discusses conjugal relationships between native Indian women and their colonizers. However, while Ghosh summarizes multiple different cases of interracial relationships in which women held small but varying amounts of agency, Chatterjee focuses on the interpretations of domestic slavery where the women held very little power at all.

In the latter half of my research, I digitized artefacts from Sharaf un-Nisa’s collection, such as by transcribing her notebooks and letters and encoding them in Text Encoding Initiative (TEI)-compliant XML format. I found this task fascinating, as such personal items humanize historical figures in ways that no amount of reading could. I also assisted with editing photographs, compiling metadata using Wax, and designing the website on which our research findings are hosted.

Although my assistantship has ended, the Unstable Archives project plans to continue uncovering the lives of Indian women who cohabitation with their colonizers. I really enjoyed taking part in this project to digitally preserve the evidence of Sharaf un-Nisa’s life as she lived it — a rarity when records of the native Indian companions to European men are few and far between. Working with Unstable Archives contributed to my educational experience by guiding me through the intricacies of conducting archival research. It helped me realize an entire new potential field of study by showing me exactly what digital humanities entails.

For further reading:

Chatterjee, Indrani. Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 

Ghosh, Durba. Sex and the Family in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

About Juliana Lu

Hello! My name is Juliana Lu, and I'm an undergraduate (C/O 2024) from Dallas, Texas. Currently, I'm studying cognitive science and computer science at the University of Pennsylvania. My research with the Unstable Archives project focuses on the digitization and archival representation of gender in colonial empires, particularly in South Asia.