As an Australian born Chinese with parents who exposed me to the negotiation strategies of Beijing’s Silk Street Market in early adolescence, I am no stranger to bargaining. And I had been informed extensively by almost everyone that as an obvious foreigner in India, I would constantly be ripped off. And they were right – auto rickshaws regularly tried to charge me triple the local price, and I paid almost double for a kurta at Dilli Haat, compared to an identical one purchased by our boss Chitra at the same place.
But even though I (and my fellow co-interns) have no trouble bargaining, and I am budgeting and tracking my expenses very closely for this trip, every time I close a bargaining transaction, agree on the price, and the person on the other end expresses extreme reluctance, I do feel some guilt.
When you are in a country where so many people live in poverty, what are the ethics of bargaining?
Since I’m a debater at heart, I’m going to divide this into two threads: the principle and the practical.
The Principle (deontological):
- Do Bargain: The principle of fairness demands that I should bargain, because why should I be paying a different price than locals for the exact same good?
- Don’t Bargain: Rawl’s principle of distributive justice would condemn this kind of bargaining because it makes the worse off, even worse off. Is it hypocritical for me to bargain when I’m meant to be doing a social justice esque internship?
The Practical (utilitarian):
- Do Bargain: I don’t want to get ripped off – I worked hard for my money. Also, even though I am bargaining down the price, I am not coercing the other party into a transaction. They are free to refuse my offer and walk away. Therefore, (to make my high school economics teacher proud), any transaction that occurs should be Pareto efficient (make both parties no worse off), meaning that utility would still be gained by the seller, even if I force down the price (otherwise they wouldn’t sell to me).
- Don’t bargain: 1 INR (Indian rupee) to me means so much less than 1 INR does for a tuk tuk driver, because of a) diminishing marginal returns and b) the fact that 1 INR goes much further in India, than it does in the States. They would probably gain much more utility from 1 rupee than I would.
At the end of the day, I will still probably continue to bargain. But I will consider the arguments against it, and calibrate my expectations to expect a reasonable price, even if it is not exactly what a local would pay. And I’ll keep mulling over this question, so perhaps by the end of my time here I’ll have a better answer.
And like everything, it’s all about balance. I’ll still probably haggle when it comes to autos and shawls, but when it comes down to it, I won’t spend 20 minutes arguing over 10 rupees, and accept that maybe, just maybe, we’ll be led totally astray to some random tourist trap by our auto driver (who totally didn’t get a commission from the sale) and buy some insanely overpriced essential oils and incense… (but that’s a story for another time).